UNSPSC 85875004: Magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of thyroid gland using other contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of thyroid gland using other contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BG34YZZ

UNSPSC 85875004 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of thyroid gland using other contrast is a Commodity code that in state and local procurement practice does not map cleanly to recent solicitation activity. The three most recent state and local opportunities posted under or near this code involve diagnostic imaging systems, special education contracted services, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which align with the narrowly defined clinical service (thyroid MRI with contrast) that the code nominally describes. San Mateo Medical Center's October 2026 RFP for a Diagnostic Imaging PACS system is the closest match by industry domain, but it addresses enterprise picture archiving and communication system procurement and implementation rather than a specific imaging procedure or modality. The other two opportunities — Birdville Independent School District's special education services RFP and Santa Clara County Health System's temporary health professional staffing qualification solicitation — fall outside diagnostic imaging scope entirely and appear to be coding mismatches in the source systems.

The code shows little relevant recent activity. When state and local governments do procure advanced imaging services or systems, they typically tag opportunities under broader diagnostic imaging or health information technology families rather than procedure-specific commodity codes. Firms evaluating pursuit under this code should verify the actual scope of work in any RFP before committing resources, as the disconnect between the code's definition and actual buying patterns suggests either inconsistent tagging practice or limited use of this particular commodity classification in state and local procurement.