UNSPSC 85874815: Computerized tomography (ct scan) of bilateral orbits using low osmolar contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to computerized tomography (ct scan) of bilateral orbits using low osmolar contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BN231ZZ

UNSPSC 85874815 Computerized tomography (CT scan) of bilateral orbits using low osmolar contrast is a Commodity code that nominally describes a specific diagnostic imaging procedure, yet recent state and local opportunities posted under it show minimal alignment with this narrow scope. The three recent opportunities span diagnostic imaging system infrastructure (a Picture Archiving and Communication System implementation), portable ultrasound equipment procurement, and phlebotomy services — none of which involve CT scanning or contrast administration. The code appears to function as a catch-all classification for health care diagnostic and clinical services across state and local health systems, hospitals, and law enforcement agencies rather than as a descriptor of a discrete imaging modality or procedure.

San Mateo Medical Center in California posted an RFP for enterprise-grade PACS implementation due August 7, 2026, covering radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging with EPIC integration; Collier County, Florida issued a Notice of Intent to single-source ultrasound equipment (KOSMOS platform with TORSO-ONE USB Probe and five-year warranty) with a submission deadline of March 26, 2026; and the Albuquerque Police Department in New Mexico posted an RFB for on-call phlebotomy technician services due February 25, 2026, supporting approximately 300 annual service calls across Bernalillo County. Activity appears scattered across the West and Southwest with no clear geographic concentration. The code's mismatch between its nominal scope and actual procurement activity suggests either systemic miscoding within state and local databases or deliberate use of the code as a generic filing category for clinical services procurement.