UNSPSC 85874122: Computerized tomography (ct scan) of superior vena cava using intravascular optical coherence

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to computerized tomography (ct scan) of superior vena cava using intravascular optical coherence. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code B528Z2Z

UNSPSC 85874122 Computerized tomography (CT scan) of superior vena cava using intravascular optical coherence, a Commodity code, shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's title describes a highly specialized diagnostic imaging procedure — CT imaging of a specific anatomical structure using a particular advanced technique — yet the recent solicitations tagged under it span enterprise-wide imaging infrastructure (picture archiving and communication systems), portable ultrasound equipment, and phlebotomy services. The actual work being solicited under this code does not center on the superior vena cava imaging procedure itself but rather on broader diagnostic and clinical laboratory support systems and services that health care providers and public safety agencies use to capture, store, and process patient specimens and imaging data.

Recent opportunities come from a county health system and municipal public-safety and healthcare agencies across three states: San Mateo Medical Center (California) posted an RFP on July 9, 2026 for a diagnostic imaging PACS to support radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging, due August 7, 2026; Collier County, Florida issued a notice of intent on April 1, 2026 to single-source EchoNous ultrasound equipment and software; and the Albuquerque Police Department (New Mexico) issued an RFB on January 26, 2026 for on-call blood draw services by certified phlebotomy technicians, due February 25, 2026. The issuing bodies are county health systems and municipal departments rather than a concentrated cohort of repeat buyers. The code shows activity across California, Florida, and New Mexico, though the sparse recent-opportunity record and the mismatch between the code's technical definition and the actual services being procured suggest this commodity code may see limited state and local usage or that procurement bodies are applying it inconsistently to services outside its intended scope.