UNSPSC 85873531: Fluoroscopy of right jugular veins using low osmolar contrast, guidance

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to fluoroscopy of right jugular veins using low osmolar contrast, guidancefluoroscopy of right jugular veins using low osmolar contrast, guidance. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code B5131ZA

UNSPSC 85873531 Fluoroscopy of right jugular veins using low osmolar contrast, guidance is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The three most recent opportunities tagged under this code do not align with its nominal scope: San Mateo Medical Center's RFP for a Diagnostic Imaging PACS system (posted October 7, 2026, due October 21, 2026) solicits enterprise-grade picture archiving and communication software with EPIC integration to support radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging workflows across 65,000 annual radiology studies, 5,000 cardiology studies, and 8,000 mammography interpretations—a platform-level procurement rather than a specific imaging procedure or service. Birdville Independent School District's RFQ for special education contracted services (posted September 18, 2026, due October 21, 2026) covers audiologists, diagnosticians, dyslexia evaluators, and therapists across its 30 campuses serving 24,300 students, with a contract value of $398,494.30 for the 2026–2027 term—unrelated to fluoroscopy. Santa Clara County Health System's non-exclusive, multiple-award staffing qualification vehicle (posted July 7, 2026, due October 7, 2026) establishes a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing in categories including diagnostic imaging and radiology, audiology, and therapy services, with no guaranteed volume and contract terms negotiated case-by-case.

The mismatch between the code's clinical-procedure designation and the actual opportunities suggests either systematic miscoding of state and local procurement records or minimal demand for fluoroscopy-specific procedure billing or service contracts at the jurisdiction level. The issuing bodies—a county health system, an independent school district, and a county health department—represent typical state and local healthcare and education buyers, but they are procuring systems, staffing frameworks, and general diagnostic services rather than the discrete imaging modality this code nominates. Business development professionals should verify whether procurement in this commodity code reflects genuine market demand or represents a data-quality issue in how state and local agencies tag their notices.