UNSPSC 85872745: Computerized tomography (ct scan) of bilateral renal arteries using high osmolar contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to computerized tomography (ct scan) of bilateral renal arteries using high osmolar contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code B4280ZZ

UNSPSC 85872745 Computerized tomography (CT scan) of bilateral renal arteries using high osmolar contrast is a Commodity code that shows minimal direct alignment with recent state and local contract activity. The code nominally describes a specific diagnostic imaging procedure using CT technology, but the recent opportunities tagged under it reflect broader health-system procurement of imaging infrastructure, staffing, and ancillary clinical services rather than CT scans as a billable clinical service or supply line. San Mateo Medical Center's October 2026 RFP for a Diagnostic Imaging Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) involves enterprise radiology software supporting CT, cardiology, and mammography imaging workflows, not CT scan procurement itself. The two other recent opportunities—Birdville Independent School District's special education contracted services and Santa Clara Health System's temporary health professional staffing pool for ancillary clinical roles—are plainly unrelated to CT imaging. The code appears to reflect a UNSPSC taxonomy mismatch rather than active state and local demand for CT scan services specifically.

Geographic activity is limited to California (San Mateo County, Santa Clara County) and Texas (Tarrant County BISD) in the recent block, with no pattern of repeat activity or concentrated buyer interest under this code. The source supports no additional relevant opportunities beyond the San Mateo PACS solicitation, which closes October 21, 2026 and involves EPIC EHR integration, 99.9% uptime requirements, data migration from a legacy ScImage system, and evaluation weighted toward project approach (30 points), firm qualifications (25 points), team qualifications (20 points), and price (25 points). A 5–10% local preference applies under San Mateo County ordinance. The mismatch between the code's clinical procedure name and the actual work being solicited suggests that this Commodity code may not be a productive procurement focus for firms pursuing state and local imaging or clinical service contracts.