UNSPSC 85871707: Fluoroscopy of left subclavian artery using other contrast, laser intraoperative

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to fluoroscopy of left subclavian artery using other contrast, laser intraoperativefluoroscopy of left subclavian artery using other contrast, laser intraoperative. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code B312Y10

UNSPSC 85871707 Fluoroscopy of left subclavian artery using other contrast, laser intraoperative is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The three most recent opportunities posted under this code—a diagnostic imaging PACS system replacement at San Mateo Medical Center, special education contracted services at Birdville Independent School District in Texas, and a temporary health professional staffing pool at Santa Clara County Health System—are unrelated to the code's nominal scope of fluoroscopic cardiac imaging procedures. The San Mateo opportunity targets enterprise-grade picture archiving and communication system software and implementation services; the Birdville posting covers school-based special education contractor services including speech therapy and behavioral analysis; and the Santa Clara posting seeks temporary staffing in ancillary health professions ranging from audiology to sterile processing. None of these align with the specific diagnostic imaging modality and anatomical procedure the code purports to describe.

This mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by the issuing bodies or that the code has been repurposed in state and local procurement classification systems in ways that diverge sharply from the UNSPSC standard definition. The opportunities do originate from distinct issuing bodies—a county public hospital system, an independent school district, and a county health system—across California and Texas, but they do not represent a coherent procurement category. Business development professionals should verify with issuing bodies directly whether this code reflects their actual contracting needs or whether a different classification would better match the work being solicited.