UNSPSC 85811504: Introduction of other diagnostic substance into pericardial cavity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a administrative intervention or procedure to introduction of other diagnostic substance into pericardial cavity, percutaneous approach. This administrative intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 3E0Y3KZ

UNSPSC 85811504 Introduction of other diagnostic substance into pericardial cavity, percutaneous approach (Commodity) shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity; recent opportunities tagged to this code do not match its clinical scope and should be disregarded as a mislabeling artifact.

The code nominally describes a cardiac intervention procedure — the percutaneous injection of diagnostic contrast or therapeutic agents into the pericardial space. The recent opportunities block contains 41 state and local solicitations posted between June and October 2026, including virtual urgent care services (IEHP, California), medical services (DeKalb County, Georgia), PACE operations (Nevada), cancer registry services (San Mateo County, California), EMT staffing for a jail (Boulder County, Colorado), employee health clinic administration (City of Ocala, Florida), occupational health services (multiple counties), employee wellness programs, opioid treatment and recovery services, behavioral health crisis stabilization, and various ancillary health professional and medical support roles. None of these opportunities involve cardiac interventions, pericardial procedures, or diagnostic substance injections. The opportunities span health plan administration, occupational health screening, behavioral health treatment, substance use disorder services, wellness platform technology, and staffing for emergency medical and mental health functions — a portfolio entirely unrelated to the procedure described by the UNSPSC code. This mismatch signals either systematic data-entry error or category assignment drift in the state and local procurement system; the code does not reflect genuine buying activity in state and local markets worth pursuing at this tier.