UNSPSC 85811212: Introduction of oxazolidinones into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a administrative intervention or procedure to introduction of oxazolidinones into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach. This administrative intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 3E0M328

UNSPSC 85811212 Introduction of oxazolidinones into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The recent opportunities tagged under this code bear no meaningful connection to the surgical pharmaceutical procedure the code nominally describes; instead, they reflect a broad and unrelated mix of healthcare service solicitations including telehealth urgent care, medical services, nursing home operations, cancer screening, occupational health, EMS billing, and employee wellness platforms. State and local procurement offices appear to have tagged these opportunities with this code in error, and the code does not capture authentic demand for oxazolidinone introduction procedures in the state and local marketplace.

The issuing bodies across the recent-opportunities block span multiple jurisdictions and governance types—health plan authorities (Inland Empire Health Plan in California), county health departments and behavioral health agencies (DeKalb County Georgia; Nevada Health Authority; Santa Clara County California; various others), municipal health systems (San Mateo Medical Center, City of Phoenix), emergency services agencies (Boulder County Sheriff's Office), school districts (Parkway School District), state health and human services departments (Texas HHSC, Colorado Department of Human Services), and regional purchasing cooperatives (Sourcewell, H-GAC). Nevada Health Authority appears as a repeat buyer, issuing two separate RFPs in October 2026 (PACE operations and Rural Value Acceleration Network vendor services). The geographic spread is national, with recent activity concentrated in California (San Mateo County, Los Angeles County, Inland Empire), Nevada, Colorado, Texas, Georgia, Florida, Arizona, Kansas, Oregon, Illinois, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia. The code's current tagging by state and local systems signals a taxonomy alignment problem rather than genuine procurement opportunity, and pursuing work under this code would require clarification with individual issuing bodies about their actual service needs rather than reliance on the nominal code definition.