UNSPSC 85811207: Introduction of local anesthetic into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a administrative intervention or procedure to introduction of local anesthetic into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach. This administrative intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 3E0M3BZ

UNSPSC 85811207, "Introduction of local anesthetic into peritoneal cavity, percutaneous approach," is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a clinical procedure—anesthetic injection into the peritoneal cavity via percutaneous approach—yet the recent opportunities tagged to this code span virtual urgent care, medical director services, cancer screening, employee wellness platforms, opioid treatment programs, nursing home operations, and emergency medical staffing. These procurements have no meaningful connection to the procedure named in the code. State and local buyers appear to use this Commodity code imprecisely or as a default categorization for broader healthcare service contracts rather than for the specific procedural intervention the code describes. No recent solicitations are actually purchasing anesthetic injection services, peritoneal procedures, or related medical devices under this code.

Issuing bodies across the records include state health authorities (Nevada, Colorado, Texas, New Jersey), county health systems and behavioral health departments (Santa Clara, Sedgwick, Ventura, Seminole, Rockland, San Mateo, Brevard, DeKalb), municipalities (City of Phoenix, City of Ocala, City of Atlanta), school districts (Parkway), independent authorities (Events DC, Sourcewell), and specialty districts (Boulder County Sheriff, Sarasota County Fire). Geographic spread encompasses California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia. Without a meaningful alignment between the code's nominal scope and actual procurement activity, the code is not a reliable vehicle for business development targeting state and local contracts.