UNSPSC 85791507: Transplantation of endocrine system into products of conception, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to transplantation of endocrine system into products of conception, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 10Y04ZP

UNSPSC 85791507 Transplantation of endocrine system into products of conception, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The recent opportunities tagged to this code — independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical carve-out benefits for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — fall substantially outside the code's nominal scope of endocrine transplantation procedures. State and local procurement does not appear to source endocrine transplant procedures as a line item; the opportunities present instead reflect routine occupational health, pension administration, municipal benefits contracting, and clinical staffing services that are categorized elsewhere within UNSPSC taxonomy.

No active solicitations directly aligned with endocrine transplantation services appear in the recent opportunities block. The geographic spread and issuing-body mix reflected in the tagged records span Arizona (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), California (City of Long Beach, County of Santa Clara Health System), Washington (Washington State Department of Transportation), and Texas (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), along with Florida (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), but these jurisdictions are sourcing services fundamentally unrelated to the code's procedural scope. The mismatch between the code definition and the work actually being bought suggests either a data-classification error in the state procurement systems or that this code does not represent active state and local spending at present.