UNSPSC 85791050: Repair eye in products of conception via natural or artificial opening other device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to repair eye in products of conception via natural or artificial opening other device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 10Q08YH

UNSPSC 85791050 Repair eye in products of conception via natural or artificial opening other device, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that maps poorly to recent state and local procurement activity. The code appears designed for obstetric or gynecologic surgical procedures, yet the recent solicitations tagged under it span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, disability medical evaluations, and temporary clinical staffing — none of which involves eye repair or fetal intervention.

The most recent opportunities show no meaningful concentration in the code's nominal scope. The Washington State Department of Transportation posted RFP20260825 on August 25, 2026 for occupational medical surveillance services for ferry workers across 14 Washington locations, due October 9, 2026; the City of Phoenix Retirement Office posted RTMRFP26001 on September 16, 2026 for independent medical evaluation services to support disability pension determinations, due October 16, 2026 at a maximum contract value of $750,000 over five years; and the County of Santa Clara Health System posted RFSQFHY270052 on July 7, 2026 establishing a qualified vendor pool for temporary ancillary clinical staffing across multiple specialties, due October 7, 2026. Issuing bodies include state transportation departments, city retirement offices, county health systems, and county probation departments. The geographic activity spans Washington, Arizona, Florida, Texas, and California. The mismatch between code definition and actual procurement suggests the code is either misapplied in state and local systems or sees limited relevance to current contracting patterns — vendors pursuing work under this code should verify the actual scope in each RFP rather than rely on the UNSPSC description.