UNSPSC 85783158: Alteration of right lower extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to alteration of right lower extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0Y0947Z

UNSPSC 85783158 Alteration of right lower extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The UNSPSC code describes a specific surgical procedure code drawn from clinical taxonomy; the six recent state and local opportunities posted between July and September 2026 under this code classification cover independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, youth detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which align with the code's nominal orthopedic surgical scope. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by issuing bodies or use of this UNSPSC as a default placeholder for broader medical services procurement rather than a genuine signal of demand for lower-extremity tissue-substitute surgery.

State and local issuers active under this code include a city retirement office (Phoenix), a municipal health system (Long Beach), a state transportation department (Washington), a county juvenile probation department (Harris County, Texas), a county board of commissioners (Collier County, Florida), and a county health system (Santa Clara County, California). Opportunities cluster in Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. Given the disconnect between the code's surgical specificity and the actual procurements tagged to it, business development focus should examine whether these issuers are systematically using this code for medical services more broadly or whether the misclassifications represent isolated data-entry errors; the volume and geographic spread of the mismatch warrants direct clarification with procurement offices before allocating resources to pursue work under this classification.