UNSPSC 85783117: Supplement right lower extremity with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement right lower extremity with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0YU94JZ

UNSPSC 85783117 Supplement right lower extremity with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific surgical procedure — implantation of a synthetic lower-extremity prosthetic device using minimally invasive technique — yet the recent opportunities posted under this code in the source reflect healthcare contracting and medical services procurement entirely unrelated to orthopedic implant supply or surgical prosthetics: inmate medical and pharmacy services management, pharmacy benefit administration, virtual primary care platforms, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical directorship. The mismatch between the code's clinical scope and the actual solicitations posted suggests either a classification error in state and local procurement systems or the code's rare use for healthcare services contracting broadly rather than for the specific device and procedure it nominates.

The recent-opportunities block surfaces no meaningful activity in prosthetic device supply, surgical implants, or orthopedic materials to state and local bodies under this code tier. Four distinct issuing bodies — Muscogee County (Georgia), Collier County (Florida), Monroe County (Florida), and San Mateo County (California) — posted opportunities in the February–May 2026 window, but all tagged this code for administrative healthcare services rather than medical devices or surgical supplies. Unless state procurement offices have systematized a practice of applying this surgical-procedure code to healthcare services contracts as a taxonomy workaround, this code shows little current relevance to prosthetics, implants, or device suppliers pursuing state and local work.