UNSPSC 85783039: Drainage of left lower extremity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of left lower extremity, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0Y9B3ZZ

UNSPSC 85783039 Drainage of left lower extremity, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code with a nominal clinical scope that bears no meaningful relationship to the state and local procurement activity posted under it. The recent opportunities in the source block are tagged with this code but solicit health services administration, occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, and medical evaluation services — none of which align with surgical drainage procedures. The code shows no recent procurement activity for the clinical service its name describes.

State and local issuing bodies posting under this code over the past two months include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (independent medical evaluation services for disability determinations, RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation on behalf of Washington State Ferries (occupational medical surveillance, RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), the City of Long Beach (surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits management, RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management, RFP 25-8414, proposal deadline April 9, 2026), Santa Clara County Health System (temporary health professional staffing pool, RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026), and Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, RFI 071626BNM, due September 25, 2026). These solicitations span Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no identifiable concentration in any single jurisdiction or region. The mismatch between the code's clinical nomenclature and the administrative and staffing services actually being procured suggests either a cataloging error or systematic miscoding by state and local agencies, and firms evaluating this code should validate opportunity relevance through direct source review rather than relying on the code's stated scope.