UNSPSC 85782250: Insertion of infusion device into left lower leg, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of infusion device into left lower leg, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0YHJ03Z

UNSPSC 85782250 Insertion of infusion device into left lower leg, open approach is a Commodity code that shows a significant mismatch between its nominal medical procedure scope and the state and local contract opportunities recently tagged under it. The six recent opportunities in the source — spanning independent medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-outs, occupational health surveillance, youth detention medical care, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — describe procurement of medical administration, benefits management, and workforce services rather than the surgical insertion of infusion devices. None of the solicitations name or reference infusion device procurement, surgical procedures on lower extremities, or orthopedic implants. The code appears to be either a data entry error in the tagging system or reflects a broader miscoding pattern within a particular procurement jurisdiction's UNSPSC classification practices.

The recent opportunities do show activity from diverse state and local issuing bodies — city retirement offices (City of Phoenix), municipal human resources departments (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county health systems (Collier County, County of Santa Clara) — across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. However, none of this activity is relevant to infusion device insertion or procurement. Given the absence of genuine opportunities under the code's stated commodity definition and the apparent systematic miscoding in the source material, this code warrants flagging as a data quality issue rather than pursuit as an active procurement area.