UNSPSC 85781909: Repair left 1st toe, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to repair left 1st toe, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0YQQ3ZZ

UNSPSC 85781909 Repair left 1st toe, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code describes a specific surgical procedure and does not align with the scope of work in the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it. The posted opportunities span inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support for mental health workers, and fire department medical direction — none of which involve orthopedic surgery or podiatric repair. This mismatch suggests either a cataloging error in the state and local procurement system or that the code is rarely used for actual state and local purchasing; no concrete evidence supports active procurement for the procedure named in the code itself.

The opportunities that do appear under this code reflect broader healthcare service contracting by state and local jurisdictions. Muscogee County, Georgia (Columbus Consolidated Government) posted an RFP in April 2026 for comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services with a May 15, 2026 response date; Collier County, Florida issued an RFP for pharmacy benefit management services in April 2026 covering approximately 2,400 enrolled employees; Monroe County, Florida solicited virtual primary and urgent care services in March 2026 with an April 16, 2026 deadline; San Mateo County, California issued an RFP for peer support services targeting mental health workers; and the Santa Monica Fire Department sought a medical director through a February 2026 RFP. These jurisdictions represent county-level and municipal healthcare administration, not state-level procurement. The geographic spread includes Georgia, Florida, and California, though the code's assignment to these opportunities appears incidental rather than systematic. The disconnect between the code's ostensible scope and the work actually being solicited suggests this code should not drive targeted business development activity for state and local healthcare services.