UNSPSC 85781715: Inspection of left foot, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to inspection of left foot, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0YJN0ZZ

UNSPSC 85781715 Inspection of left foot, open approach is a Commodity code with minimal alignment to recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical inspection procedure—does not match the work state and local governments are actually buying under this designation. Recent opportunities tagged with this code involve occupational health surveillance, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and surgical benefit carve-out programs. These solicitations span clinical administration, occupational medicine compliance, and benefits design rather than a discrete left-foot surgical inspection service.

The issuing bodies across recent opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (RFP for independent medical evaluation services due October 16, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance for ferries employees, proposals due October 9, 2026), the City of Long Beach (surgical benefit carve-out for PPO members, proposals due October 7, 2026), the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary health professional staffing, proposals due October 7, 2026), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (RFI for emergency and specialty medical services, due September 25, 2026), and Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management, though this opportunity shows an expired submission deadline of April 9, 2026). The code shows little meaningful activity aligned to its stated scope and warrants careful vetting before pursuit—the mismatch between the code's clinical procedure focus and the administrative, occupational health, and staffing services actually being solicited suggests either a classification error in the jurisdictions' tagging or a code that has diverged substantially from current buying patterns.