UNSPSC 85781607: Supplement left 4th toe with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left 4th toe with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0YUW0KZ

UNSPSC 85781607 Supplement left 4th toe with nonautologous tissue substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a specific orthopedic surgical procedure involving toe reconstruction—does not align with the state and local contract opportunities posted under this code. Recent solicitations tagged to 85781607 cover inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support programs for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction—none of which involve orthopedic or podiatric surgical procedures. The mismatch suggests either a data-classification error in the source system or that this code has been repurposed at the state and local level in a way that diverges from its federal medical-taxonomy intent.

The four representative opportunities span multiple state and local issuing bodies: Muscogee County Prison medical and pharmacy services in Georgia (RFP No. 26-0008, due May 15, 2026); Collier County Board of County Commissioners Pharmacy Benefit Management Services in Florida (RFP 25-8414, posted April 9, 2026); Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Virtual Primary and Urgent Care Services in Florida (RFP, due April 16, 2026); and Santa Monica Fire Department Medical Director services in California (RFP 628, posted February 25, 2026). The geographic spread reflects Florida, Georgia, and California activity, with no concentrated regional pattern. Pursuit of this code is not recommended without first clarifying whether the classification error resides in the code assignment or in the solicitation database itself.