UNSPSC 85772901: Supplement left little finger with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left little finger with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0XUW4KZ

UNSPSC 85772901 Supplement left little finger with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure involving tissue replacement of a finger—does not align with the recent opportunities tagged to it. The most recent solicitations posted under this code are for occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent medical evaluation services, surgical benefits carve-out programs, and emergency medical services for detained youth. None of these procurements involve finger-replacement surgery or tissue-substitute implantation procedures. The mismatch suggests either a data-coding error in the underlying procurement records or that the code is being used as a catch-all for health services procurement more broadly, rather than for the specific orthopedic procedure the code name describes.

The recent opportunities span multiple issuing bodies and states: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), the Washington State Department of Transportation (Washington), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (California). The solicitation types include RFPs for independent medical evaluations, surgical benefits programs, and occupational medical surveillance, as well as RFIs and qualification vehicles for broader health professional services. Because the code's nominal scope does not match what is actually being procured, the code itself is not a reliable predictor of state and local buying activity or a productive avenue for business development targeting surgical or tissue-substitution services.