UNSPSC 85772221: Inspection of left axilla, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to inspection of left axilla, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0XJ50ZZ

UNSPSC 85772221 Inspection of left axilla, open approach is a Commodity code that carries a medical procedural taxonomy label with minimal relevance to state and local procurement activity. The recent opportunities posted under this code do not align with the axillary inspection procedure the code nominally describes; instead, they span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, disability medical record review, surgical center-of-excellence networks, and youth detention healthcare services. The code shows no recent activity directly addressing the specific procedural service named in the taxonomy.

State and local issuing bodies posting under this code include county health systems, county boards of commissioners, municipal retirement boards, state transportation departments, and county juvenile probation agencies. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office (on behalf of the Phoenix Fire and Police Pension Boards) posted an RFP for Independent Medical Evaluation Services due October 16, 2026, with a $750,000 five-year contract maximum; the Washington State Department of Transportation posted an RFP for occupational medical surveillance services due October 9, 2026 with a pre-bid conference scheduled August 31, 2026; the County of Santa Clara Health System posted an RFSQ for temporary health professional staffing across multiple ancillary clinical categories due October 7, 2026; and Collier County posted an RFP for Pharmacy Benefit Management Services (due April 9, 2026, with historical spending at approximately $8.7 million annually). Geographic activity spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The code's inconsistent tagging suggests either data-quality issues in the underlying procurement database or a systematic mismatch between the medical taxonomy assigned and the procurement functions actually being executed under it.