UNSPSC 85771952: Alteration of right upper extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to alteration of right upper extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0X0637Z

UNSPSC 85771952 Alteration of right upper extremity with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code whose nominal medical-procedure scope does not align with the work actually being solicited under it in recent state and local opportunities. The code shows no relevant recent activity. The six opportunities posted between July and September 2026 and tagged to this code cover occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Ferries), independent disability medical evaluations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), surgical benefit carve-outs for municipal employees (City of Long Beach), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), temporary health professional staffing (County of Santa Clara Health System), and emergency medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department) — none of which involve orthopedic reconstruction of the right upper extremity using autologous tissue. The tagging appears to reflect a systematic miscoding by issuing offices rather than genuine procurement demand under the code's stated scope.

State and local buyers are active in health services contracting across multiple jurisdictions and issuing-body types — county healthcare systems, municipal retirement offices, city employee benefits programs, and county juvenile justice departments — but their actual purchasing under this code designation does not reflect the orthopedic surgical procedure the code nominally describes. Business development professionals should not pursue this code on the basis of current state and local activity. The mismatch suggests either a data-quality issue in how opportunities are being classified or a fundamental misapplication of UNSPSC 85771952 by the procuring agencies themselves.