UNSPSC 85771326: Insertion of infusion device into left upper arm, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of infusion device into left upper arm, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0XH933Z

UNSPSC 85771326 Insertion of infusion device into left upper arm, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not map to the state and local procurement opportunities currently tagged with it. The recent solicitations posted under this code—inmate medical and pharmacy services for a county correctional facility, pharmacy benefit management for a county employee health plan, virtual primary and urgent care services for a county workforce, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director services—involve administrative healthcare contracting, benefits management, and professional services, not the clinical procedure of percutaneous infusion device insertion that the code nominally describes. State and local procurement offices do not typically solicit this specific procedural intervention as a standalone commodity or service; when they contract for inpatient or correctional healthcare, they procure comprehensive medical service packages that may include such procedures as part of a broader scope rather than as discrete line items.

The mismatch between code and solicitation suggests either a cataloging error in the issuing offices' tagging systems or a fundamental disconnect between the UNSPSC taxonomy and how these jurisdictions classify healthcare procurement. The tagged opportunities show activity from Georgia (Muscogee County Prison), Florida (Collier County, Monroe County), California (San Mateo County), and California (Santa Monica Fire Department)—spanning correctional health, employee benefits administration, virtual care delivery, behavioral health support, and medical direction—but none of these align with procurement of a procedural medical device or service as the code defines it. No recent state and local RFP, RFQ, IFB, or ITB activity supports pursuing this code as a valid procurement category for vendors in this space.