UNSPSC 85765310: Removal of other device from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of other device from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WPR7YZ

UNSPSC 85765310 Removal of other device from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening is a Commodity code, but the recent state and local opportunities posted under this code do not align with its clinical scope. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure for extracting foreign objects or obstructive devices from the urinary or reproductive tract, yet the six recent solicitations tagged to it span independent medical evaluations for disability pension determinations, surgical benefits carve-outs, occupational health surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing. None of these activities involve genitourinary device removal or closely related clinical procedures. The mismatch signals that this code shows little relevant recent activity and reflects a classification error in the posting systems used by the issuing jurisdictions.

The opportunities that are tagged to this code originate from diverse issuing bodies—municipal retirement offices (City of Phoenix), city employee benefits programs (City of Long Beach), state transportation departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county human resources and health consortiums (Collier County, Santa Clara County)—and span Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The geographic and issuing-body diversity, combined with the absence of any genitourinary device removal solicitations, indicates that vendors pursuing state and local work under this code should verify classification before committing resources, as the code appears to be a miscategorization vehicle rather than a reliable taxonomy marker for procurement under its stated scope.