UNSPSC 85765309: Removal of radioactive element from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of radioactive element from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WPR81Z

UNSPSC 85765309 Removal of radioactive element from genitourinary tract, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The six recent opportunities posted under this code classify medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, juvenile detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary clinical staffing — none of which align with the code's nominal scope of urological endoscopic intervention for radioactive material removal. The mismatch between the code classification and the actual work being solicited suggests either tagging error by the issuing bodies or code obsolescence for state and local purchasing; the code does not reflect current procurement demand in this space.

The opportunities span multiple states and issuing-body types: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), City of Long Beach (California), Washington State Department of Transportation ferries system, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and Santa Clara County Health System (California). Recent notices include the Phoenix Fire and Police Pension Boards' RFP for independent medical evaluation services due October 16, 2026; Washington State Ferries' RFQ for occupational medical surveillance due October 9, 2026; and Santa Clara Health System's RFQ for temporary health professional staffing due October 7, 2026. Given the consistent disconnect between code designation and procurement substance across multiple jurisdictions, firms targeting this code should verify actual scope alignment before pursuing.