UNSPSC 85765141: Fragmentation in pelvic cavity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to fragmentation in pelvic cavity, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WFJ3ZZ

UNSPSC 85765141 Fragmentation in pelvic cavity, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no meaningful alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code's description — a specific surgical procedure — does not match the types of opportunities tagged under it in the source material. Recent solicitations posted under this code include inmate medical and pharmacy services for a county correctional facility, pharmacy benefit management administration for a county health consortium, virtual primary and urgent care services for county employees, peer support services for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction. None of these procurements involve fragmentation procedures or percutaneous surgical interventions, indicating either systematic miscoding in the source system or a data quality issue rather than active procurement demand under the code's stated scope.

The recent opportunities that happen to carry this code span multiple states and issuing-body types — Muscogee County Prison in Georgia (RFP No. 26-0008 for inmate medical services, due May 15, 2026), Collier County in Florida (RFP 25-8414 for pharmacy benefit management, due April 9, 2026), Monroe County in Florida (RFP628 for virtual primary and urgent care, due April 16, 2026), San Mateo County in California (RFP No. 2025-007 for peer support services, due July 2, 2025), and Santa Monica Fire Department in California (RFP 455 for medical director services, due October 16, 2025) — but these reflect county human resources, correctional health, behavioral health, and fire department operations rather than any coherent demand under the fragmentation procedure code itself. Business development activity under this code should treat the miscoding as a signal to verify actual scope with issuing bodies rather than relying on the UNSPSC taxonomy as drafted.