UNSPSC 85765035: Insertion of other device into retroperitoneum, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of other device into retroperitoneum, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WHH0YZ

UNSPSC 85765035 Insertion of other device into retroperitoneum, open approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope describes a surgical procedural insertion—a clinical intervention that does not align with the state and local government contracting opportunities posted under this code designation.

The recent opportunities tagged to this code reflect substantial misclassification and actually represent healthcare administration and service delivery: inmate medical and pharmacy services for county correctional facilities, pharmacy benefit management for employee health plans, virtual primary and urgent care platforms for county employees and retirees, peer support services for mental health workers, and emergency medical services medical direction. These are distinct from the surgical procedure named in the code itself. This mismatch suggests the code is not being used as intended by state and local procurement offices, or posting systems have applied it incorrectly. No state or local government body solicits the insertion of retroperitoneal devices as a direct procurement line item; instead, such procedures, if performed, would be embedded within comprehensive medical services contracts at correctional facilities or hospitals. For vendors evaluating this code for business development purposes, the actual activity lies in healthcare service delivery—particularly correctional health services, employee health plan administration, and virtual care platforms—rather than in surgical device insertion. The geographic activity appears concentrated in Florida (Collier County, Monroe County) and Georgia (Muscogee County), with secondary activity in California (San Mateo County) and California municipalities (Santa Monica), though the sample is too small and misaligned to characterize a reliable market. This code warrants monitoring only if your firm pursues healthcare service contracts; the code's nominal scope does not reflect genuine state and local procurement demand.