UNSPSC 85765003: Revision of infusion device in pelvic cavity, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of infusion device in pelvic cavity, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WWJ03Z

UNSPSC 85765003 Revision of infusion device in pelvic cavity, open approach (Commodity) shows a substantial mismatch between its nominal surgical scope and the actual work state and local governments are soliciting under the code. The recent opportunities tagged to this code encompass independent medical evaluation services, occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, specialty surgical networks and Centers of Excellence, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve infusion device revision or pelvic cavity procedures. The code appears to be a cataloging error or overcatch in how state and local procurement offices are tagging health services, benefits administration, and medical staffing work that falls outside the code's stated commodity definition.

The issuing bodies soliciting under this code span city pension boards, municipal HR departments, state transportation agencies, county health systems, and county probation departments across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Representative recent opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026, $750,000 over five years), the City of Long Beach's RFP for surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits (HR26753, due October 7, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance services (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), and Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management services (RFP 25-8414, with historical annual spending of approximately $8.7 million). Given the disconnect between the code name and the types of services actually being procured, this code should not be relied upon as a targeting mechanism for pursuing state and local medical device, surgical procedure, or implant-focused opportunities.