UNSPSC 85764417: Removal of infusion device from lower jaw, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of infusion device from lower jaw, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WP533Z

UNSPSC 85764417 Removal of infusion device from lower jaw, percutaneous approach (Commodity) does not align with actual state and local procurement activity under this code. The recent opportunities block shows no solicitations for the surgical procedure named in the code itself. Instead, the tagged opportunities span independent medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, occupational medical surveillance, surgical center-of-excellence carve-out benefits, specialty medical services for youth in custody, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve removal of infusion devices. The code appears to be a clinical procedure taxonomy entry misapplied to administrative or benefit-management procurement functions, creating a fundamental mismatch between the UNSPSC category name and what state and local governments are actually buying under it.

No relevant state and local procurement activity supports this code's nominal scope. The source records contain no requests for infusion device removal services, minimally invasive dental or jaw procedures, or related clinical surgical capabilities. The issuing bodies shown — the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach, Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County, and County of Santa Clara Health System — are pursuing healthcare administration, benefits consulting, occupational health management, and staffing services. Buyers pursuing procurement under this code should verify classification with the issuing jurisdiction, as the mismatch suggests either a cataloging error or a systematic misapplication of the commodity code to non-procedure spend.