UNSPSC 85764407: Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from neck, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from neck, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WP63KZ

UNSPSC 85764407 Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from neck, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code with minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its clinical scope. The source material includes six recent state and local contract opportunities posted between July and September 2026, but only one—the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's independent medical evaluation services RFP—relates tangentially to medical evaluation and assessment functions. The remaining five opportunities address pharmacy benefit management, occupational medical surveillance, temporary health professional staffing, surgical carve-out benefits, and emergency/specialty medical services for detained youth; none of these solicitations involve tissue removal, surgical procedures, or the specific intervention the code describes. The Phoenix opportunity (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026) seeks medical record review and scheduling of independent medical and psychiatric examinations for approximately 75 annual disability benefit applications under Arizona's Public Safety Personnel Retirement System, with a total maximum contract value of $750,000 over five years commencing February 3, 2027—a fit only to the extent that the code nominally involves medical evaluation, not tissue removal services.

The code shows no geographic concentration or issuing-body pattern relevant to procurement under its stated scope. Activity spans Arizona (Phoenix), California (Long Beach, Santa Clara County), Florida (Collier County), Washington State (Department of Transportation, Harris County, Texas), and does not evidence repeat buyers pursuing tissue-removal or surgical-intervention contracting. The mismatch between the code's clinical specificity and the actual work being solicited suggests either an incorrect code assignment by the source, an artifact of broader healthcare service procurement categories being tagged imprecisely, or a genuine absence of state and local tissue-removal procedure contracting tracked under this code in the recent period. No representative surgical or tissue-removal opportunities appear in the source material. Business development professionals evaluating this code should expect minimal, sporadic, or administratively miscoded activity until evidence of direct procurement demand for the specified procedure emerges.