UNSPSC 85763116: Supplement lower back with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement lower back with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WUL4JZ

UNSPSC 85763116 Supplement lower back with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code, but recent state and local procurement activity tagged under this code shows no alignment with orthopedic or spinal surgical implant procurement. The five most recently posted opportunities in the source span inmate medical and pharmacy services (Muscogee County Prison), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County, Florida), virtual primary and urgent care services (Monroe County, Florida), peer support services for behavioral health workers (San Mateo County, California), and fire department medical director services (Santa Monica, California). None of these solicitations involve spinal implants, orthopedic devices, or percutaneous endoscopic surgical procedures. The code appears to be a data-classification mismatch in the underlying procurement records; state and local agencies are not procuring spinal surgical implants or related orthopedic products under this taxonomy marker.

No recent state and local procurement activity directly relevant to the code's nominal scope—lower back synthetic implants for percutaneous endoscopic procedures—is evident in the available record. The opportunities listed reflect healthcare service delivery, clinical staffing, and benefit administration rather than medical device or implant procurement. Business development professionals evaluating this code for state and local opportunities should treat it as inactive for practical pursuit purposes and verify the UNSPSC classification in any future RFP or RFQ that references it, as the current record suggests systematic tagging error rather than genuine market demand at the state and local level.