UNSPSC 85762601: Revision of other device in cranial cavity, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of other device in cranial cavity, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WW13YZ

UNSPSC 85762601 Revision of other device in cranial cavity, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a neurosurgical procedure category, but the recent state and local opportunities tagged under this code do not reflect medical device implantation, cranial procedures, or percutaneous neurosurgical work. Instead, the tagged solicitations cover occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical carve-out networks, temporary health professional staffing, and specialty hospital services for detained youth—none of which fall within the scope of the code's procedural name. The mismatch suggests either that issuing bodies have misclassified these opportunities or that the code is not actively used for actual procurement in state and local government at this time.

The geographic and issuing-body spread across the tagged opportunities spans multiple states and jurisdiction types: Phoenix (Arizona municipal retirement board), Long Beach (California municipal employer), Washington State Department of Transportation (state agency), Harris County (Texas county), Collier County (Florida county), and Santa Clara County (California county health system). However, because none of these opportunities represent actual cranial-cavity device revision work, the code does not demonstrate material procurement activity in its primary domain. State and local governments pursuing work in medical devices, neurosurgery, or hospital-based surgical procedures should verify code classification against their specific target RFPs rather than rely on this code's recent tagging record.