UNSPSC 85761410: Revision of synthetic substitute in male perineum, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in male perineum, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0WWM4JZ

UNSPSC 85761410 Revision of synthetic substitute in male perineum, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its nominal medical-procedure taxonomy label and actual state and local purchasing activity. The recent solicitations tagged under this code do not involve urological surgical revision or synthetic implant procedures; instead, they span occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit administration, temporary health professional staffing, and youth detention medical services—none of which connect to the code's stated scope. State and local procurement offices posting these opportunities appear to have applied the code as a catchall for health services broadly rather than as a targeted category for the specific surgical procedure the code names. The code shows no relevant recent activity for firms pursuing work in urological or perineal surgical revision services.

The geographic spread of the recent opportunities spans Washington State (Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries), Arizona (City of Phoenix), California (City of Long Beach and County of Santa Clara), Florida (Collier County), and Texas (Harris County), but these solicitations do not represent the actual scope of UNSPSC 85761410. The Washington State Ferries occupational medical surveillance RFP (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026) and the City of Long Beach surgery benefit carve-out program (HR26753, due October 7, 2026) are the most developed recent postings in the block, yet neither involves revision of male perineal synthetic substitutes. Vendors should verify code alignment with issuing bodies before responding, as the mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding or a data error in the source material.