UNSPSC 85753244: Removal of drainage device from scrotum and tunica vaginalis, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of drainage device from scrotum and tunica vaginalis, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VP830Z

UNSPSC 85753244 Removal of drainage device from scrotum and tunica vaginalis, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The source includes six recent state and local contract opportunities, none of which align with the code's clinical procedure scope: Phoenix's independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, Long Beach's surgical benefit carve-out for Centers of Excellence, Washington State Ferries' occupational medical surveillance, Harris County Juvenile Probation's youth detention emergency medical services, Collier County's pharmacy benefit management, and Santa Clara Health System's temporary health professional staffing pool. These opportunities span medical administration, surveillance, and staffing services rather than urological surgical procedures or device removal. The code appears to be a clinical procedure classification that state and local procurement offices do not commonly tag in their solicitations.

State and local health purchasing activity captured in the recent record emphasizes administrative and management services—benefits coordination, vendor networks, occupational health compliance, emergency care capacity, and temporary clinical staffing—rather than specific procedural codes. If your firm provides urological surgical services or device-removal supplies, this code's absence from recent state and local RFPs suggests limited pull through traditional procurement channels in these jurisdictions. Verify code assignment with the issuing health authorities before pursuing; the mismatch between the code's clinical specificity and actual state and local buying patterns warrants further investigation.