UNSPSC 85752869: Insertion of infusion device into scrotum and tunica vaginalis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of infusion device into scrotum and tunica vaginalis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VH883Z

UNSPSC 85752869 "Insertion of infusion device into scrotum and tunica vaginalis, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic" is a Commodity code that shows no meaningful recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its clinical scope. The six recent opportunities posted under this code — spanning Phoenix retirement pension boards, Long Beach employee benefits, Washington State Ferries occupational health, Harris County youth detention medical services, Collier County pharmacy benefits, and Santa Clara County temporary health professional staffing — are uniformly misaligned with the code's narrow urological-procedure specification. These solicitations address independent medical evaluations for disability determinations, surgical carve-out benefits programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty inpatient care, pharmacy benefit administration, and ancillary clinical staffing; none involve urological device insertion or any procedure matching the code's medical descriptor. The code itself appears to be a clinical taxonomy entry intended for healthcare provider networks or medical device manufacturers rather than a genuine state and local procurement vehicle, and the tagging mismatch suggests either systematic classification error in the underlying opportunity database or inadvertent application of an inapplicable code across a portfolio of health-services RFPs.

No state and local government procurement activity directly matching the code's scope is present in the source. Firms considering pursuit under this code should verify with issuing procurement offices whether the tagging reflects genuine demand for the specified procedure or represents a data-entry artifact; the consistent mismatch across multiple jurisdictions and opportunity types indicates the code is not a reliable predictor of actual health services or medical device demand in state and local markets.