UNSPSC 85752819: Revision of synthetic substitute in testis, via natural or artificial opening

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in testis, via natural or artificial opening. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VWD7JZ

UNSPSC 85752819 Revision of synthetic substitute in testis, via natural or artificial opening is a Commodity code showing little relevant recent activity. The recent state and local opportunities tagged under this code do not reflect the specific urological procedure described by the code's nominal scope; instead, they represent general medical services procurement across occupational health, disability evaluation, pharmacy benefit management, surgical care coordination, youth detention healthcare, and temporary clinical staffing. The code appears to be a misclassification artifact in state and local procurement systems rather than a category under which governments actively solicit testicular prosthetic or reconstructive services.

The opportunities posted under this code originate from issuing bodies spanning county health systems, municipal retirement offices, state transportation agencies, county probation departments, and county human resources divisions across Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. Representative recent solicitations include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (RFP RTMRFP26001, response due October 16, 2026, up to $750,000 over five years), the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (RFP RFP20260825, response due October 9, 2026), and Collier County's RFP for pharmacy benefit management services (RFP 25-8414, historical program value approximately $8.7 million annually). Given the systematic mismatch between the code's anatomical specificity and the actual work being solicited, the code does not present a reliable indicator of market activity or procurement intent for urological prosthetic procedures in state and local contracting.