UNSPSC 85752744: Bypass bilateral vas deferens to right epididymis with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass bilateral vas deferens to right epididymis with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0V1Q4KJ

UNSPSC 85752744 Bypass bilateral vas deferens to right epididymis with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that in practice does not align with actual state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it solicit occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, specialty surgical networks for public employees, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency youth detention medical services—none of which involve the procedure named in the code itself. State and local buyers are using this code to classify general medical services, benefits administration, and healthcare staffing rather than the specific urological procedure the code nominally represents.

Recent opportunities show activity across multiple jurisdiction types: city retirement offices (City of Phoenix), county health systems (Santa Clara County Health System, Collier County, Harris County), state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), and municipal employee benefits programs (City of Long Beach). The Washington State Ferries occupational medical surveillance RFP (due October 9, 2026) and the City of Phoenix independent medical evaluation services RFP (due October 16, 2026) represent the most concrete recent uses of the code. Geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Given the fundamental mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the healthcare services actually being solicited, the code shows little actionable market signal for vendors seeking opportunities in the procedure it nominally describes; firms pursuing state and local medical services work should monitor broader healthcare procurement codes rather than this one.