UNSPSC 85752671: Occlusion of left spermatic cord with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of left spermatic cord with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VLG4CZ

UNSPSC 85752671 Occlusion of left spermatic cord with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal relevance to actual state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure for male fertility intervention—does not align with the recent opportunities tagged under it. The source contains six recent state and local solicitations, none of which involve spermatic cord occlusion or related urological procedures. Instead, the tagged opportunities span independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical carve-out benefit programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—a portfolio that reflects broad health-care administration and workforce services rather than a single defined clinical procedure.

The recent opportunities originate from diverse issuing bodies including a city retirement office (Phoenix), a city employee benefits program (Long Beach), a state transportation department (Washington State), a county juvenile probation department (Harris County, Texas), a county health consortium (Collier County, Florida), and a county health system (Santa Clara, California). Geographic distribution spans Arizona, California, Texas, Washington, and Florida. The code displays no concentrated activity pattern and no repeat buyers. Because the UNSPSC category does not correspond to any of the solicitations actually being pursued under it, the code merits review for potential miscoding within state and local procurement systems rather than direct business development pursuit.