UNSPSC 85752668: Occlusion of bilateral spermatic cords with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of bilateral spermatic cords with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VLH4CZ

UNSPSC 85752668 Occlusion of bilateral spermatic cords with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code's nominal scope—a highly specific urological surgical procedure—does not align with the recent opportunities tagged under it. The most recent solicitations posted under this code involve occupational medical surveillance, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty medical services for detained youth, and emergency healthcare delivery—none of which involve the procedure the code nominally describes. This disconnect suggests either a cataloging error in the state and local procurement databases or a mismatch between how this code has been applied to broader healthcare administration and management services.

The recent opportunities do reflect healthcare service procurement activity across multiple issuing bodies—city retirement offices (Phoenix), city human resources departments (Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county health systems (Santa Clara), county boards (Collier County, Harris County), and special-purpose public entities. However, because none of these solicitations involve the specific procedure named in UNSPSC 85752668, business development professionals should verify the correct commodity classification for their service offerings before pursuing opportunities tagged under this code. The mismatch between the code's clinical definition and the administrative and managed-care services actually being solicited suggests the code may not be the appropriate filtering mechanism for state and local procurement activity in healthcare services more broadly.