UNSPSC 85752530: Occlusion of bilateral vas deferens, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of bilateral vas deferens, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VLQ3ZZ

UNSPSC 85752530 Occlusion of bilateral vas deferens, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but recent state and local procurement activity tagged under this code bears no substantive connection to the code's name. The sourced opportunities — independent medical evaluations for pension-board disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-outs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — are administrative healthcare services, benefits management, and workforce augmentation, not urological procedures. State and local procurement systems occasionally mis-tag opportunities when cataloging healthcare and benefits contracts; this code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its stated commodity scope.

The issuing bodies in the sample span city retirement offices (Phoenix), municipal employee benefits programs (Long Beach, Collier County), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice departments (Harris County), regional public health systems (Santa Clara County Health System), and county benefits procurement (Collier County). Geographic distribution includes Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida across the six opportunities posted between late July and mid-September 2026, with response deadlines clustering in early October 2026. No clear pattern of repeat procurement under this code emerges from the recent record; each issuing body appears once. The mismatch between code name and actual buying activity suggests that procurement professionals should verify UNSPSC categorization during opportunity screening rather than relying on code alignment alone.