UNSPSC 85752005: Revision of autologous tissue substitute in vas deferens, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of autologous tissue substitute in vas deferens, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VWR87Z

UNSPSC 85752005 Revision of autologous tissue substitute in vas deferens, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The six most recent opportunities posted under this code span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out networks, and emergency medical services for youth in detention — none of which align with the code's nominal scope of urological tissue-substitute procedures performed endoscopically. The mismatch suggests either miscoding in the state and local procurement systems or that this code is not commonly used for active solicitations in the state and local market.

The issuing bodies in the recent-opportunities block include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), the Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (California). Geographic spread across Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington indicates no regional concentration. Without opportunities that actually map to urological endoscopic procedures, no representative work scope or response dates aligned to the code's stated purpose can be extracted from the source material. Firms evaluating this code should treat it as inactive or systematically miscoded in current state and local procurement practice and verify code classification directly with issuing bodies before pursuing opportunities tagged under it.