UNSPSC 85751809: Removal of synthetic substitute from penis, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of synthetic substitute from penis, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VPS3JZ

UNSPSC 85751809 Removal of synthetic substitute from penis, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code with minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned to its clinical nominal scope. The recent opportunities tagged under this code do not reflect surgical or urological procedures; instead, they capture health plan administration, occupational medical surveillance, disability evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary clinical staffing — functions unrelated to the code's stated description. The mismatch indicates that this code does not currently represent active state and local purchasing in its intended medical specialty area.

The tagged opportunities span diverse issuing bodies including municipal retirement offices (City of Phoenix), city employee benefit programs (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County), county employee health consortia (Collier County), and county health systems (Santa Clara County). Geographic activity appears across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no concentration in any single jurisdiction. Representative recent solicitations include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (due October 16, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation's request for occupational medical surveillance (due October 9, 2026), and Collier County's pharmacy benefit management RFP (initial deadline April 9, 2026). The code shows no substantive procurement volume in its declared clinical domain and appears to be a taxonomy classification error rather than a meaningful procurement category for surgical or urological vendors.