UNSPSC 85751322: Removal of synthetic substitute from prostate and seminal vesicles, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of synthetic substitute from prostate and seminal vesicles, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VP44JZ

UNSPSC 85751322 Removal of synthetic substitute from prostate and seminal vesicles, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under this code. The six most recent state and local opportunities posted across the procurement market carry this code but involve medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, youth detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which align with the urological surgical procedure named in the code's description. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding by posting jurisdictions or that this particular UNSPSC category is not actively used by state and local buyers to tag actual solicitations.

The recent opportunities span state departments (Washington State Department of Transportation), counties (Harris County, Collier County, Santa Clara County), cities (Phoenix, Long Beach), and county health systems, but the work solicited under this code number — disability medical record summaries for pension boards, surgical Centers of Excellence networks, occupational health exams for ferry workers, emergency care for detained youth, pharmacy administration, and clinical staffing placement — falls outside the procedural scope the Commodity code nominally describes. Business development professionals should verify coding accuracy with issuing bodies before pursuing opportunities tagged under this code, as the disconnect between the code's nominal scope and the actual solicitations suggests either data quality issues or a systematic avoidance of this code for its intended use case.