UNSPSC 85751115: Resection of bilateral seminal vesicles, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to resection of bilateral seminal vesicles, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VT30ZZ

UNSPSC 85751115 Resection of bilateral seminal vesicles, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with actual state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure; however, recent opportunities posted under this code involve occupational health surveillance, disability medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, surgical procedure carve-out benefit programs for municipal employees, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for youth in custody — none of which relate to the procedure named in the code. The mismatch suggests either a data classification error in the state and local procurement system or a systematic misalignment between the UNSPSC taxonomy and how issuing bodies tag opportunities in practice.

The limited recent activity under this code does not reflect genuine procurement for the nominated service. State and local buyers posting opportunities are primarily counties and city governments addressing employee health benefits administration, occupational safety compliance, and temporary clinical staffing — domains that fall under entirely separate UNSPSC families. No opportunities present in the source actually solicit resection of bilateral seminal vesicles or related urological surgical services. Buyers include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, the City of Long Beach, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and the County of Santa Clara Health System. The geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. Without relevant recent procurement under the code's stated scope, pursuit is not advisable; the code appears inactive for its intended commodity and warrants verification against the issuing jurisdiction's taxonomy data before further business development effort.