UNSPSC 85751102: Revision of synthetic substitute in prostate and seminal vesicles, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in prostate and seminal vesicles, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0VW40JZ

UNSPSC 85751102 Revision of synthetic substitute in prostate and seminal vesicles, open approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure involving urological implants, yet the recent state and local solicitations tagged under it involve occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, disability medical evaluations, pediatric detention medical services, surgical carve-out networks for municipal employees, and temporary clinical staffing — none of which align with the code's stated scope. The mismatch suggests either miscoding at the source level or a taxonomy drift where this code has been repurposed or overapplied in practice.

The issuing bodies span county health systems (Santa Clara County Health System, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), municipal employee benefit programs (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), and county benefits administration (Collier County Board of County Commissioners). Recent posted opportunities include the County of Santa Clara Health System issuing an RFQ for temporary ancillary clinical staffing across 13 specialties with proposals due October 7, 2026, and the Washington State Department of Transportation soliciting occupational medical surveillance services for ferry workers across 14 locations with proposals due October 9, 2026. Activity appears concentrated in California, Arizona, Florida, and Washington, though the geographic spread is limited by the small sample size. Given the evident disconnect between the code's nominal medical-device scope and the actual work being bought — which centers on staffing, benefit administration, and occupational health management — this code warrants investigation for potential reclassification or serves primarily administrative procurement taxonomy purposes at the state and local level rather than reflecting genuine opportunity for vendors in the urological-implant space.