UNSPSC 85742514: Revision of extraluminal device in fallopian tube, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of extraluminal device in fallopian tube, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UW84CZ

UNSPSC 85742514 Revision of extraluminal device in fallopian tube, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal scope—a specific surgical procedure—does not align with the recent opportunities posted under this code. The six most recent postings under 85742514 span independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for state ferry workers, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing networks—none of which involve revision of fallopian tube devices or any related gynecological procedures. The mismatch suggests either a taxonomy classification error in the state and local procurement systems posting these opportunities or that the code is not actively used for its intended medical device scope in the jurisdictions reporting to the source.

The issuing bodies are geographically dispersed and operationally diverse: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), City of Long Beach (California), Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and County of Santa Clara Health System (California). The recent opportunities represent municipal employee benefits administration, state occupational health programs, county detention healthcare, and county health system staffing—none indicative of demand for the surgical procedure the code nominally names. Business development professionals evaluating this code should verify that their target market aligns with the actual medical services and staffing categories state and local buyers are soliciting, rather than assuming the code reflects active procurement under its formal definition.