UNSPSC 85742413: Extirpation of matter from bilateral fallopian tubes, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to extirpation of matter from bilateral fallopian tubes, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UC73ZZ

UNSPSC 85742413 Extirpation of matter from bilateral fallopian tubes, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the recent opportunities tagged under it address occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, surgical benefits networks for government employees, and temporary health professional staffing—none of which align with the code's stated scope of work. The mismatch between the code's clinical definition and the actual work being solicited suggests either a data-tagging error or a procurement classification that does not reflect contemporary state and local health benefit and staffing activity.

Among the opportunities present, state and local bodies including the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), the Washington State Department of Transportation (Washington), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (California) posted notices for independent medical evaluation services, surgical benefits carve-outs, occupational health surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary ancillary health professional staffing. The geographic spread spans at least six states with no single jurisdiction appearing as a repeat buyer under this code. The diversity of issuing bodies (state agencies, counties, cities, health systems) and service types suggests that if this code were properly aligned with state and local procurement, it would capture health benefit administration and clinical staffing rather than procedural surgery itself.