UNSPSC 85742307: Revision of infusion device in uterus and cervix, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of infusion device in uterus and cervix, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UWD33Z

UNSPSC 85742307 Revision of infusion device in uterus and cervix, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its nominal medical-device scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The recent opportunities block contains no solicitations for infusion devices, percutaneous uterine or cervical procedures, or related medical hardware. The six posted opportunities span occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Ferries), independent medical evaluations for disability retirement determinations (Phoenix), surgical procedure carve-out benefits and Centers of Excellence networks (Long Beach), emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth (Harris County), pharmacy benefit management services (Collier County), and temporary ancillary clinical staffing (Santa Clara Health System). None of these solicitations involve infusion-device procurement, revision procedures, or percutaneous uterine interventions.

The code shows little relevant recent activity in state and local procurement. Issuing bodies that have posted under or near this taxonomy include regional transit authorities, city retirement offices, county health systems, counties, and municipalities across Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington; however, their work product—medical services contracting, staffing, and benefits administration—bears no substantive relationship to the code's stated commodity. No representative opportunities under this code's actual scope are present in the source material. Business development professionals evaluating this code should treat it as inactive in current state and local government procurement and investigate whether misclassification by procurement offices or data-aggregation misalignment explains the disconnect.