UNSPSC 85742255: Bypass left fallopian tube to right fallopian tube with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left fallopian tube to right fallopian tube with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0U160J5

UNSPSC 85742255 Bypass left fallopian tube to right fallopian tube with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the state and local procurement activity in the source material. The recent opportunities tagged under this code—independent medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-outs, occupational medical surveillance, youth detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—represent administrative health services, benefits procurement, and workforce staffing rather than surgical or implant procedures. The code's nominal scope describes a specific surgical technique, yet no state or local solicitation in the source reflects procurement of bypass procedures, fallopian tube repairs, or implant devices for direct medical delivery.

The mismatch suggests either a systematic tagging error in the underlying procurement database or misapplication of clinical procedure codes to health services contracts. State and local health systems, counties, and municipalities are actively soliciting medical services ranging from records review and disability evaluations to Centers of Excellence network management and temporary clinical staffing, but none of these opportunities require purchase of the surgical procedure or device the code nominally describes. The recent activity spans Arizona (Phoenix Retirement Office), California (Long Beach, Santa Clara County, Collier County), Washington (Department of Transportation), and Texas (Harris County), but the alignment between code and scope is too distant to support a reliable assessment of actual procurement demand under this code.