UNSPSC 85741926: Excision of uterus, via natural or artificial opening

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to excision of uterus, via natural or artificial opening. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UB97ZZ

UNSPSC 85741926 Excision of uterus, via natural or artificial opening is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the six posted opportunities tagged under it—spanning medical evaluation services, surgical benefit carve-outs, occupational health surveillance, juvenile detention healthcare, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—involve administrative health services, benefit management, and staffing coordination rather than direct surgical provision. No recent solicitations reference uterine surgery or gynecological procedures at all.

The mismatch suggests either a classification error in how these opportunities were tagged, or the code reflects a legacy taxonomy entry that does not map to current state and local health procurement practice. The opportunities that do appear—Phoenix's disability medical evaluation RFP (due October 16, 2026), Long Beach's surgical carve-out RFP (due October 7, 2026), Washington State Ferries' occupational medical surveillance RFP (due October 9, 2026), Harris County's youth detention healthcare RFI (due September 25, 2026), Collier County's pharmacy benefit management RFP (due April 9, 2026), and Santa Clara's temporary health professional staffing RFQ (due October 7, 2026)—reflect what state and local governments actually buy under this code tag right now. The issuing bodies span city pension boards, municipal benefits offices, state transportation departments, county health systems, and county commissioners. Geographically, activity centers in Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no clear concentration. Because the code's nominal scope bears no relation to the actual work state and local buyers are requesting, practitioners should treat this code as offering limited relevance to surgical services strategy.