UNSPSC 85741809: Removal of drainage device from uterus and cervix, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of drainage device from uterus and cervix, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 0UPD80Z

UNSPSC 85741809 Removal of drainage device from uterus and cervix, via natural or artificial opening endoscopic is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code nominally describes a specific gynecological surgical procedure, but the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it do not reflect gynecological or uterine-focused procurement. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office solicited independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026); the City of Long Beach requested surgical benefit carve-out management for multiple procedure types including orthopedic, cardiac, and oncology services (RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026); the Washington State Department of Transportation sought occupational medical surveillance services for ferry workers (RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026); Harris County Juvenile Probation Department issued an RFI for emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (RFI 071626BNM, due September 25, 2026); Collier County solicited pharmacy benefit management services (RFP 25-8414); and Santa Clara County Health System established a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories excluding nursing and physicians (RFP RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026). None of these opportunities involve drainage device removal from the uterus or gynecological procedures.

The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual work being bought suggests either a data-entry error in the tagging or a fundamental misalignment between the code and state and local procurement activity. Practitioners should verify whether this code genuinely appears in active state and local RFP cycles before investing pursuit effort. If opportunities under this code are present but systematically misclassified, prospecting activity should focus on health systems, county medical examiners' offices, and occupational health providers rather than the specialty gynecological surgical services the code nominally describes.